The Jerusalem Post Conference and Caroline Glick

Caroline GlickThe second annual Jerusalem Post Conference, subtitled Fighting for the Zionist Dream, was held in New York City rather than Jerusalem – probably to attract the widest possible audience of supporters of Zionism and Israel.

The highlight of the conference was the speech and later panel appearance by the polarizing senior contributing editor of the Jerusalem Post and editor of Latma, Caroline Glick.

Latma, which is similar in concept to Jon Stewart’s The Daily Show except with satirical songs thrown in, depicts two leftist and clueless television reporters editorializing on the current Israel-related news. Cutting through all the propaganda surrounding events, such as the Mavi Marmara flotilla, the songs can be devastatingly funny and spot-on accurate. The flotilla song We Con the World (sung to the tune of We are the World) drew millions of hits and was worth more to the Israeli side than any hasbara, as it countered the exasperated horror routinely expected from the Arab world and the EU. To say that Ms. Glick is an Israeli national treasure would be an understatement.

Born into a middle-class Jewish home in Chicago, she was raised in a traditional left-leaning liberal environment. After making aliyah to Israel, she claimed to have come to understand realpolitik. To her, leftists are fools who wish for a world that doesn’t and will never exist. For example, the fact that Israelis, Americans, and the European countries want there to be peace in the Middle East and want there to be a two-state solution for Israel and the Palestinians, doesn’t mean that the Palestinians or the Arab world wants the same. She believes that the Palestinians will never give up the idea of the destruction of Israel and at best will yield to a two-stage solution in which the Jewish state is first stripped of defensible borders and is then attacked with missiles and bombs until it is defeated, whether it takes decades or centuries. She has a long-term strategist’s view of the Middle East that is not pleasant, but certainly devastating.

Thus, when she speaks even to a pro-Israel audience, she can be condescending, and when she replies to other speakers, she can be dripping with sarcasm and animus. She is like an elementary school teacher who must tell a clueless kindergartner over and over again not to place his wet hand over an electrical outlet. Like the greater public, the student never quite gets the danger even if he is shocked over and over.

Like Snidely Whiplash, the evil enemy of Dudley Do-Right in Rocky and Bullwinkle Show, she curled her lip in a snarl that said it all. Except in this version, she was the hero and Dudley was a dud who didn’t know what he was doing. She is brilliant, incisive, cutting and just a shade paranoid. But in the world she lives in, paranoia can be life saving.

So is she the wunderkind of Israeli politics or just the enfant terrible? Maybe she is just an acerbic Daniel Patrick Moynihan, who, against the wishes of his superiors, railed at the UN against the passing of the Zionism is Racism resolution in 1975. I believe she is a brilliant person – with a blind spot. That is, she doesn’t see that we Americans do see what an impossible and unfair situation Israel is in. Where anything Jews do is biased and under-handed, whereas whatever their opponents do is above-board and laudable. Where suicide bombing and indiscriminate rockets are simply tools of resistance, but Israeli defense is a war crime. Where an American Jew is accused of dual loyalty if he supports Israel, but an Irish American is just supporting his heritage when he supports Ireland. Where 12 million Jews are said to control the world, while a billion Moslems are helpless and a billion Christians wring their hands in silence. In such a world, it is not surprising that Caroline Glick is angry and frustrated. It is only surprising that more of us citizens of the world are not.

Glick does not think too highly of Americans. When she started her presentation, she stated that she would much rather speak on another topic, but that we Americans needed to hear her. She said that the purpose of the BDS (boycotts, divestment and sanctions) movement was the destruction of the state of Israel, not just the elimination of Israel from the West Bank. She asked why Jews are inviting anti-Semites, including former President Carter and BDS members to speak at Jewish forums? Are we fools and dupes?

After the 1973 Israeli–Arab war in which Israel conquered the West Bank, part of Jerusalem, and the Golan Heights, the international left abandoned Israel. Leftist Jews now join with Israel’s enemies to destroy it, while stating how courageous they are. But Israel and American Jews need each other, and might not survive without each other. There is an unwillingness to call things by their names. These are uncomfortable truths. Glick is very angry but still hopeful.

My problem with Caroline Glick is that I think the majority of Americans, including a majority of Jews, do understand Israeli-Arab problems and the unremitting prejudice against Israel from the Arab world, many EU countries, and especially the UN. I see a perceptible turning to Israel even among the twenty-somethings who are traditionally more to the left of the political spectrum. , the contemporary news site of the young, has gotten consistently more pro-Israel in its reader comments.  Several years ago, the majority of the readers’ comments were anti-Israel; today, the majority are either pro-Israel or at least understanding of its positions. In fact, I see that Israel today is in a far stronger position than its friends think and its enemies desire.

Will There Ever Be Peace Between Israel and the Palestinians?

If you really want to be depressed, contemplate the chance of success for peace between Israel and the Palestinians. The issues between them seem insurmountable.

As long as Israel holds the West Bank it is ruling a recalcitrant population. But if it withdraws to the 1967 borders, which are in reality the 1949 armistice lines, the narrow middle of the country could be cut in half by an Arab/Palestinian attack.

Israel is composed of leftists and secularists who are willing to withdraw
from some or all of the West Bank. It is also composed of the right and the ultra-religious, some of whom are willing to live in peace in the West Bank with the Palestinians, whether the area is called Judaea and Samaria or Palestine.

The Palestinians seem to want the West Bank Judenrein, something it was not before the Jordanians invaded in 1948. Given the current realities, it is not possible to get 500,000 religious and nationalistic Jews to withdraw without an Israeli civil war.

Based on history, if Israel does withdraw, the future of peace is less than assured.
When Israel withdrew from Lebanon, it got Hezbollah; when it withdrew from Gaza,
it got Hamas. If it withdraws from the West Bank, it could get a militarized Palestine
importing arms and rockets from Syria, Lebanon and Gaza. If Jordan falls to the
majority Palestinian inhabitants, the future is bleak for Israel.

When the Palestinians speak in English, they proclaim that Israel must withdraw
to the 1967 borders. When they speak in Arabic, they frequently say that the Jewish state of Israel must be destroyed and that not one inch of the area can ever be in Jewish hands.

The western press and many of their reporters who lean to the left always seem to favor the underdog. Israel is far stronger than the Palestinians, so there is little doubt of their allegiance. The UN, with a core of Arab and other third-world countries, is understandably anti-Israel, sometimes even shading into anti-Jewish. With more than twenty wars going on between Islamic extremists and what they consider to be infidels, it is surprising that the UN mostly criticizes Israel. Or maybe not.

With Israel’s hundreds of nuclear and other sophisticated weapons, you would have
to be insane to try to destroy it. The Arab terrorist groups must know what the
endgame would be. The question is: Are they fanatical enough to try it anyway?

Justice and Freedom Deteriorating in Palestine

In the past month the Palestinian Authority has been repeatedly interfering in the affairs of journalists and judges. Five journalists have been arrested this month by the Palestinian Authority security forces. The Palestinian Authority claimed that the journalists were inciting against the PA leadership, and were supporting Hamas. Two of the journalists still remain in jail.

One of the journalists, Walid Khaled, was ordered to be released by a judge, but the Palestinian Authority has so far refused to comply.

The Palestinian Journalists Syndicate called for the journalists’ release, and warned that freedom of expression had “seriously deteriorated” in the West Bank.

Palestinian judges have recently gone on strike to protest the Palestinian Authority’s repeated attempts to interfere in the judicial system. Hasan Khraisheh, deputy speaker of the Palestinian Legislative Council, said that the Palestinian Authority was trying to seize control over the judiciary system by appointing its supporters to senior positions.

The Palestinian Authority has tried to to install the justice minister as attorney-general, and has tried to pass laws without consulting the PLC, both of which would violate the constitution.

We want to be fully independent in our work“, said Ibrahim Amr, chairman of the Palestinian Judges’ Society. “We don’t want anyone or any party to interfere with our work.” He added, “This marks the beginning of the collapse of the Palestinian judicial system“.

Posted in Politics | Tagged courts, , Hasan Khraisheh, judicial system, , Palestinian Authority, Palestinian Journalists Syndicate, Palestinian Legislative Council, Walid Khaled, | Leave a reply