Turkey: The Country not the Bird

My wife and I recently returned from a cruise in the Mediterranean where we saw the sites of Italy, Greece and Turkey. I had thought that Erdogan’s Islamization of Turkey would have made it a very repressive country, and that Attaturk’s vision of a secular Turkey was as dead and buried as he was. I also thought that Italy and Greece were mostly western countries in the mold of Western Europe. What I found was the opposite.

While I loved visiting Italy and Greece once again, the impression I received was one of vibrant Third World countries that didn’t use credit cards — I constantly had to change dollars into euros in Rome and Athens – and countries that would be more at home in Eastern Europe. However, the museums were fantastic — even though you don’t know when parts of them will closed at weird hours for lack of money. The ancient Roman and Greek sites made it feel as if Rome and Greece still ruled the world, but those days are definitely millennia passed.

I expected Turkey to be similar, and it was in regard to credit cards, but it was much stranger than Italy or Greece. Arriving in Istanbul, the first thing you notice are the mosques, hundreds of them adorning the cityscape. I felt as if I’d arrived in an alien world where the mosques almost seemed as if they were flying saucers that had temporarily landed.

Istanbul, Turkey

One thing the government under the General Directorate of Foundations is trying to do is to reconvert museums and churches into mosques. There are no shortage of mosques, and according to the locals, one does not need a mosque to pray. Those that have been reconverted include the thirteenth century Haghia Sophia Church in Trabzon. As another example, after an earthquake in Istanbul in 1999, the sixth century Church of St. Sergius and Bacchus . The present Islamic government of Turkey has a choice to make. So far, they seem to be making the wrong one.

Once you acclimate yourself to the ever present mosques, you will notice how western the city of Istanbul really is. You feel you could be in Belgium, England or even the US. The people we met, especially the younger generation were decidedly modern and anti-Erdogan. They appreciated western values and didn’t want to give them up. Even one religious young man who was trying to find his place within Islam didn’t want to give up the freedoms his generation has sampled. While Erdogan may wish proudly to lead his people back to the seventh century, the modern generation is more than happy to remain in the twenty-first, and some of them are willing to fight for their freedoms. Attaturk may not be dead after all.

In many ways Istanbul is a modern city, it is a hub for international business and a modern cosmopolitan city. Even in the nineteenth century spice bazaar, you can get your Turkish Delight candy specially cut for you and then have the box shrink wrapped for freshness and to go easily through customs. But it is also pays attention to its traditional side in the care it takes to present its time-honored Mediterranean cooking. Its vegetarian tradition is beyond compare. In short, Turkey has the best of the old and the new. My wife and I liked it so much that we are thinking of going back in the spring. With the warmth of its people, its western and eastern flavors and its marvelous ancient archaeological sites, Turkey is a better than Disneyland because it’s all real. If its government can avoid wrecking it, Turkey will remain a wonder of the ancient and modern world.

The Jerusalem Post Conference and Caroline Glick

Caroline GlickThe second annual Jerusalem Post Conference, subtitled Fighting for the Zionist Dream, was held in New York City rather than Jerusalem – probably to attract the widest possible audience of supporters of Zionism and Israel.

The highlight of the conference was the speech and later panel appearance by the polarizing senior contributing editor of the Jerusalem Post and editor of Latma, Caroline Glick.

Latma, which is similar in concept to Jon Stewart’s The Daily Show except with satirical songs thrown in, depicts two leftist and clueless television reporters editorializing on the current Israel-related news. Cutting through all the propaganda surrounding events, such as the Mavi Marmara flotilla, the songs can be devastatingly funny and spot-on accurate. The flotilla song We Con the World (sung to the tune of We are the World) drew millions of hits and was worth more to the Israeli side than any hasbara, as it countered the exasperated horror routinely expected from the Arab world and the EU. To say that Ms. Glick is an Israeli national treasure would be an understatement.

Born into a middle-class Jewish home in Chicago, she was raised in a traditional left-leaning liberal environment. After making aliyah to Israel, she claimed to have come to understand realpolitik. To her, leftists are fools who wish for a world that doesn’t and will never exist. For example, the fact that Israelis, Americans, and the European countries want there to be peace in the Middle East and want there to be a two-state solution for Israel and the Palestinians, doesn’t mean that the Palestinians or the Arab world wants the same. She believes that the Palestinians will never give up the idea of the destruction of Israel and at best will yield to a two-stage solution in which the Jewish state is first stripped of defensible borders and is then attacked with missiles and bombs until it is defeated, whether it takes decades or centuries. She has a long-term strategist’s view of the Middle East that is not pleasant, but certainly devastating.

Thus, when she speaks even to a pro-Israel audience, she can be condescending, and when she replies to other speakers, she can be dripping with sarcasm and animus. She is like an elementary school teacher who must tell a clueless kindergartner over and over again not to place his wet hand over an electrical outlet. Like the greater public, the student never quite gets the danger even if he is shocked over and over.

Like Snidely Whiplash, the evil enemy of Dudley Do-Right in Rocky and Bullwinkle Show, she curled her lip in a snarl that said it all. Except in this version, she was the hero and Dudley was a dud who didn’t know what he was doing. She is brilliant, incisive, cutting and just a shade paranoid. But in the world she lives in, paranoia can be life saving.

So is she the wunderkind of Israeli politics or just the enfant terrible? Maybe she is just an acerbic Daniel Patrick Moynihan, who, against the wishes of his superiors, railed at the UN against the passing of the Zionism is Racism resolution in 1975. I believe she is a brilliant person – with a blind spot. That is, she doesn’t see that we Americans do see what an impossible and unfair situation Israel is in. Where anything Jews do is biased and under-handed, whereas whatever their opponents do is above-board and laudable. Where suicide bombing and indiscriminate rockets are simply tools of resistance, but Israeli defense is a war crime. Where an American Jew is accused of dual loyalty if he supports Israel, but an Irish American is just supporting his heritage when he supports Ireland. Where 12 million Jews are said to control the world, while a billion Moslems are helpless and a billion Christians wring their hands in silence. In such a world, it is not surprising that Caroline Glick is angry and frustrated. It is only surprising that more of us citizens of the world are not.

Glick does not think too highly of Americans. When she started her presentation, she stated that she would much rather speak on another topic, but that we Americans needed to hear her. She said that the purpose of the BDS (boycotts, divestment and sanctions) movement was the destruction of the state of Israel, not just the elimination of Israel from the West Bank. She asked why Jews are inviting anti-Semites, including former President Carter and BDS members to speak at Jewish forums? Are we fools and dupes?

After the 1973 Israeli–Arab war in which Israel conquered the West Bank, part of Jerusalem, and the Golan Heights, the international left abandoned Israel. Leftist Jews now join with Israel’s enemies to destroy it, while stating how courageous they are. But Israel and American Jews need each other, and might not survive without each other. There is an unwillingness to call things by their names. These are uncomfortable truths. Glick is very angry but still hopeful.

My problem with Caroline Glick is that I think the majority of Americans, including a majority of Jews, do understand Israeli-Arab problems and the unremitting prejudice against Israel from the Arab world, many EU countries, and especially the UN. I see a perceptible turning to Israel even among the twenty-somethings who are traditionally more to the left of the political spectrum. , the contemporary news site of the young, has gotten consistently more pro-Israel in its reader comments.  Several years ago, the majority of the readers’ comments were anti-Israel; today, the majority are either pro-Israel or at least understanding of its positions. In fact, I see that Israel today is in a far stronger position than its friends think and its enemies desire.

Will There Ever Be Peace Between Israel and the Palestinians?

If you really want to be depressed, contemplate the chance of success for peace between Israel and the Palestinians. The issues between them seem insurmountable.

As long as Israel holds the West Bank it is ruling a recalcitrant population. But if it withdraws to the 1967 borders, which are in reality the 1949 armistice lines, the narrow middle of the country could be cut in half by an Arab/Palestinian attack.

Israel is composed of leftists and secularists who are willing to withdraw
from some or all of the West Bank. It is also composed of the right and the ultra-religious, some of whom are willing to live in peace in the West Bank with the Palestinians, whether the area is called Judaea and Samaria or Palestine.

The Palestinians seem to want the West Bank Judenrein, something it was not before the Jordanians invaded in 1948. Given the current realities, it is not possible to get 500,000 religious and nationalistic Jews to withdraw without an Israeli civil war.

Based on history, if Israel does withdraw, the future of peace is less than assured.
When Israel withdrew from Lebanon, it got Hezbollah; when it withdrew from Gaza,
it got Hamas. If it withdraws from the West Bank, it could get a militarized Palestine
importing arms and rockets from Syria, Lebanon and Gaza. If Jordan falls to the
majority Palestinian inhabitants, the future is bleak for Israel.

When the Palestinians speak in English, they proclaim that Israel must withdraw
to the 1967 borders. When they speak in Arabic, they frequently say that the Jewish state of Israel must be destroyed and that not one inch of the area can ever be in Jewish hands.

The western press and many of their reporters who lean to the left always seem to favor the underdog. Israel is far stronger than the Palestinians, so there is little doubt of their allegiance. The UN, with a core of Arab and other third-world countries, is understandably anti-Israel, sometimes even shading into anti-Jewish. With more than twenty wars going on between Islamic extremists and what they consider to be infidels, it is surprising that the UN mostly criticizes Israel. Or maybe not.

With Israel’s hundreds of nuclear and other sophisticated weapons, you would have
to be insane to try to destroy it. The Arab terrorist groups must know what the
endgame would be. The question is: Are they fanatical enough to try it anyway?

Justice and Freedom Deteriorating in Palestine

In the past month the Palestinian Authority has been repeatedly interfering in the affairs of journalists and judges. Five journalists have been arrested this month by the Palestinian Authority security forces. The Palestinian Authority claimed that the journalists were inciting against the PA leadership, and were supporting Hamas. Two of the journalists still remain in jail.

One of the journalists, Walid Khaled, was ordered to be released by a judge, but the Palestinian Authority has so far refused to comply.

The Palestinian Journalists Syndicate called for the journalists’ release, and warned that freedom of expression had “seriously deteriorated” in the West Bank.

Palestinian judges have recently gone on strike to protest the Palestinian Authority’s repeated attempts to interfere in the judicial system. Hasan Khraisheh, deputy speaker of the Palestinian Legislative Council, said that the Palestinian Authority was trying to seize control over the judiciary system by appointing its supporters to senior positions.

The Palestinian Authority has tried to to install the justice minister as attorney-general, and has tried to pass laws without consulting the PLC, both of which would violate the constitution.

We want to be fully independent in our work“, said Ibrahim Amr, chairman of the Palestinian Judges’ Society. “We don’t want anyone or any party to interfere with our work.” He added, “This marks the beginning of the collapse of the Palestinian judicial system“.

Posted in Politics | Tagged courts, , Hasan Khraisheh, judicial system, , Palestinian Authority, Palestinian Journalists Syndicate, Palestinian Legislative Council, Walid Khaled, | Leave a reply

The Tragedy of Rachel Corrie

A few weeks ago an Israeli Court decreed that Israel was not responsible for the death of International Solidarity Movement activist Rachel Corrie. Corrie was killed a decade ago trying to prevent an Israeli bulldozer from leveling Palestinian houses near underground tunnels by the border of Gaza and Egypt during the Second Intifada. Those on the left will say that she was a martyr to the cause; those on the right that she got what she deserved. It seems to me that she was a troubled young lady who was used by those around her for their own ends. She was in a war zone and people — militants, reporters or innocents frequently die.

We do know that the ISM believes Israel is an illegal state and deserves to be destroyed. We know that it and/or she placed herself in harm’s way. We also know that a dead martyr is far more powerful than a living one.There are two photos of her that I think show who she really was. In the first, she is burning a mock American flag surrounded by a multitude of young Palestinians. She seems to be screaming and her face is apparently contorted with hate. In the second, she is giving an interview shortly before her death. She looks worried, as if she is in way over her head.

Rachel Corrie - Flag Burning

Rachel Corrie - Interview

The tragedy of Rachel Corrie is a young woman full of promise, however misguided, who was never allowed to grow up and see the world as it actually is. Over the past 10 years, she has been made into a plastic saint by the left and a whore literally servicing Hamas by the right. I believe she was a young, idealistic, confused woman who has been used by many, including the ISM, the Palestinians, the left and even her own parents, to make her something she was not. I feel that she will never have a full life because the ideology of others was considered more important than her life.

Hezbollah Goading Israel Into Overreacting

Hassan Nasrallah, the Secretary-General of Hezbollah, said today that Hezbollah was responsible for the drone that entered Israeli airspace last week. The drone was designed by Iran, assembled by Hezbollah in Lebanon, and then launched by Hezbollah.

It’s not the first time (that a drone was sent) and it will not be the last. We can reach all the zones” of Israel, said Nasrallah, referring back to a 2006 incident in which a Hezbollah drone badly damaged an Israeli warship.

The drone “overflew sensitive and important installations for dozens of kilometers until the enemy spotted it near (the nuclear site) Dimona”, said Nasrallah.

Nasrallah “wants to provoke Israel and play on Arab feelings that he is still holding the flag of the Arab resistance against Israel” said Sami Nader, professor of international relations at St. Joseph University in Beirut.

As a militant group, Hezbollah is most powerful and receives most of its support during wartime. In sending the drone into Israeli airspace, Hezbollah hopes to goad Israel into overreacting, thus justifying its own presence in Lebanon as well as garnering local support.

The drone incident also helps Hezbollah distract attention from the uprising in Syria against its ally Bashar al-Assad. Nasrallah said, “The regime in Syria doesn’t need us or anyone else to fight alongside it“, however opposition groups have claimed that Hezbollah members are fighting alongside Assad’s army.

Launching the drone into Israeli airspace was also a move by Hezbollah on behalf of Iran. Hezbollah receives financial and political assistance, as well as weapons and training from Iran. Part of the drone’s job may have been to gain intel on Israel’s military and nuclear sites to share with Iran.

Both Iran and Israel have been engaged in a cold war that is threatening to turn hot. Iran has fought Israel by proxy using Hezbollah, and any antagonizing that Hezbollah does to Israel will distact Israel from its bigger threat, Iran.

If Hezbollah successfully goads Israel into retaliating, the left would see it as an example of how violent and reckless Israel is, and as evidence for Iran being the non-belligerent one. If Israel strikes Hezbollah in Lebanon, it may also give Lebanon and their allies an excuse to join the fight against Israel.

The best move Israel can make at this point regarding the drone incident is to not react to Hezbollah’s provocations. The world opinion will not be with Israel if any retaliation is made.

Woody Allen and William F. Buckley

In 1967 Woody Allen invited the conservative William F. Buckley on to his show to field audience questions with him. Woody’s ability to turn any question asked of him into a joke is truly hilarious. Buckley as the stodgy conservative makes for a great counterpart to the liberal Woody Allen. The questions asked of them cover presidential politics, Israel, mini-skirts, and more.


Mitt Romney’s Faustian Bargain

I was looking into Romney’s eyes the other day. I think I caught a glimpse of his soul. A television interviewer was asking him if, after looking at the latest polls, he could catch up and win the presidential race. His smile and words said “yes,” but his eyes looked haunted.

Mitt Romney would have been an ancient Greek tragedian’s wet dream. The scion of a Michigan governor and former American Motors Corporation president, who also ran for the Republican nomination for president, Romney was a successful businessman and former progressive governor who brought universal health care to Massachusetts, who was also pro-choice and for gay rights. As such, he would have been an ideal candidate to unseat President Obama, a likable candidate who ran on “hope and change,” but gave us a more complex reality.

As a moderate-to-progressive Republican with business experience, Romney would have won the 2012 Presidential race, possibly in a landslide. But to win the nomination, he had to turn himself into a person he didn’t really believe in. Looking into his eyes, the other night, I saw a man who had made a Faustian bargain, but knew he had lost not only the race but who he was. Within the next decade, I expect an opera or at least a play about him by a modern Wagner or Aeschylus.

Posted in Politics | Tagged Barrack Obama, Mitt Romney, presidential race, Republicans, universal health care | Leave a reply