The Extraordinary Tale of the Bermuda Petrel and the Man who Brought It Back from Extinction

Book Review:

Rare Birds: The Extraordinary Tale of the Bermuda Petrel and the Man who Brought It Back from Extinction by Elizabeth Gehrman

Rare Birds: The Extraordinary Tale of the Bermuda PetrelCrazy, eccentric curmudgeon or self-sacrificing saint? David Wingate, who almost single-handedly resurrected the near-extinct cahow, a type of petrel, is both. The Bermuda native has devoted his life to assuring the survival of a creature once so docile, abundant, and unfortunately for them, delicious, that early visitors to Bermuda, standing in one spot, easily killed four thousand in a single night.

Gehrman’s fascinating and thoroughly researched account describes how Wingate frequently risked his life on the tiny, jagged islands that compose Bermuda, fighting rough seas, hurricanes, rocky shores, and even the U.S. military, to study the cahow, long thought to be extinct. Wingate constructed artificial burrows, warded off predators, and replanted vegetation by hand, all in the name of reviving a species that was nearly wiped out in the early 1600s.

As a teenage birder in 1951, Wingate was present when American ornithologist Robert Cushman Murphy and Louis S. Mowbray of the Bermuda Aquarium discovered the first living cahow seen in 330 years, on a tiny islet called Inner Pear. At that point Wingate was hooked and became determined to restore the cahow to Bermuda, no matter what the cost. Personal discomfort meant little to him. He often spent cold, wet nights without shelter on uninhabited islands, studying the nocturnal seabirds, trying to figure out how to turn 14 birds into a viable population.

After earning a degree in zoology from Cornell University in 1957, Wingate returned home to tackle the problem of helping the cahow survive by creating devices that prevented other types of birds from getting into the cahows’ burrows. Along with their revival, Wingate came up with the idea of restoring an abandoned island called Nonsuch to its precolonial state, including, he hoped, breeding grounds for the cahow. In 1962, Wingate, his pregnant wife Anita, and their toddler moved to the island, which had few modern conveniences, making daily living quite a challenge.

There was as yet no dock at the protected north beach, so everything the young family needed – furniture, tools, books, food, clothing, and diapers; blocks of ice, since there was no refrigerator; lanterns, since there was no electricity; eighty-pound propane cylinders to fuel the stove; five-gallon cans of gas for the generator that started the pressure system to pump rainwater from the cistern to the house – had to be dragged over the beach, past the bones of cedars, through the scrub, and to the compound, three hundred yards away and uphill every step.

Wingate stuck it out on the island, hand-planting native habitat and destroying invasive species, despite horrific family tragedy and inane government bureaucracy, until finally forced to retire and leave Nonsuch in 2000. By then, three times as many breeding cahows and three times as many fledglings existed on various islets in Bermuda versus when Wingate began his work in 1962. However, he had yet to see them return to nest on Nonsuch. Finally, on a rare night visit to the island in 2011, Wingate saw about 10 cahows fluttering above him, a thrilling culmination to his astounding life’s work.

This review originally appeared in the bimonthly newspaper Happy Valley Animals.

Lawyer Creates Story of Animals, Angst and the Afterlife

Unsaid: A Novel by Neil Abramson

Unsaid: A Novel
A husband laments the death of his wife; the deceased wife watches him suffer. Ugh. Just shoot me now. But really, it’s not as depressing as it sounds. In fact, it’s not depressing at all.

Unsaid tells a remarkable story of betrayal, forgiveness, animals, humans, and a variety of relationships, all seen through the eyes of a dead woman. The narrator, Helena, was a veterinarian and animal researcher until her early demise from cancer. Now, from some non-earthly realm, she observes those she left behind.

Her husband, David, a lawyer, torn apart by her death, must make peace with the animals she loved, as well as the secret parts of her life he discovers by chance. Unbeknownst to him, Helena had helped a colleague study whether or not a chimp can be taught to communicate using sign language. When the chimp’s life is endangered and crimes are committed, David is dragged into the situation, forcing him to make difficult choices and to come to terms with the truth about the woman he thought he knew so well.

The author, Neil Abramson, a lawyer married to a veterinarian, has created a cast of characters it’s easy to care about, including chimps, pigs, horses, dogs and cats. And even if you don’t think there’s any form of life after death, Abramson’s straightforward style makes a story narrated by a dead woman somehow feel believable, especially as Helena watches her husband struggle with the animals that were once her beloved companions.

In the face of [the horse] Arthur’s obstinacy, David starts tugging on the halter, cursing under his breath. Arthur doesn’t welcome my husband’s hostility. While David still holds the halter, Arthur whips his head around, sending David tumbling into the nearby hay bales.

When David rises unsteadily from the barn floor, he reminds me of Ray Bolger in The Wizard of Oz. His knee joints wobble and hay sticks out of his hair, topcoat, pant legs, and even his socks and shoes. When he walks, hay drops out of his pants as if the hay somehow has become his very essence.

Although a dead woman tells the story, is very much a tale about life, both how and how not to live it. Perhaps the true heart of the book is the nugget of wisdom conveyed to David by an old friend of his wife: Pessimism, cynicism and fear will only lead to a very small life. Don’t live small.

This review originally appeared in the bimonthly newspaper Happy Valley Animals.

Debunking Fake Albert Einstein Quotes

Albert Einstein tongueLast updated on May 2, 2013

The reason for the proliferation of so many fake quotes attributed to Einstein is that he has become synonymous with genius and wisdom. Surely, if Einstein had said these things, then they must be wise indeed!

This post will examine popular quotes on the internet that have been falsely or mistakenly attributed to Albert Einstein.

I will update this page as more fake Einstein quotes circulate the internet. Please post a comment for any questions or corrections.

 

Fake Quotes Attributed to Einstein

1. “Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”

This false quotation is commonly printed on self-help and motivation posters. While the sentiment is nice, there is no evidence Einstein ever said this.

The first appearance of this quote is from  (2004) by Matthew Kelly, p. 80, however there is no evidence of it being printed prior, and no evidence Einstein said it.

The quote is probably based on  (1940) by George Reavis, where a fish goes to school and is required to work on his running and climbingThe Animal School was reprinted in 1999 and may have influenced Matthew Kelly or someone else to create this fake attribution.

Another alternative is that the false quotation is based on what Einstein Self-Portrait (1936),

What is significant in one’s own existence one is hardly aware, and it certainly should not bother the other fellow. What does a fish know about the water in which he swims all his life?

This real quotation may have influenced the false one above.

 

2. “It would be my greatest sadness to see Zionists do to Palestinian Arabs much of what Nazis did to Jews.”

There is no recorded evidence that Einstein ever said this quotation.

The motivation for this fake quote should be apparent. It would be beneficial to pro-Palestinian activists to show that a paragon of wisdom, and a Jew himself no less, was also pro-Palestinian and/or anti-Israel.

This fake quotation also compares Zionists to Nazis, which is suspicious because Einstein was a supporter of Labor Zionism. However, Einstein did sign an in 1948 that said, “Among the most disturbing political phenomena of our times is the emergence in the newly created state of Israel of the “Freedom Party” (Tnuat Haherut), a political party closely akin in its organization, methods, political philosophy and social appeal to the Nazi and Fascist parties.” The fake quote originally posted above, may have been inspired from this open letter.

 

3. “Logic will get you from A to B. Imagination will take you everywhere.”

This is another fake motivational/inspirational quote attributed to Einstein. The first recorded instance I found of this quote is from  (2010) by Alice Calaprice and Freeman Dyson on p. 481, however Alice lists the quote under the “Probably Not By Einstein” section.

There is no evidence Einstein ever said this quote, and frankly it doesn’t sound like something Einstein would say, as he was a highly logical individual.

 

4. “Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius—and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction.

This quote is actually written by E. F. Schumacher in a 1973 essay titled “Small is Beautiful” which appeared in The Radical Humanist: volume 37, .

This first false attributions of this quote to Einstein began to circulate on the internet in 1997, and then later appeared in print in BMJ: The British Medical Journal, volume 319, 23 October 1999, .

 

5. “The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.

There is no evidence Einstein ever said this. The likely origin of this quote is from the Basic Texts of Narcotics Anonymous, which is the first known source of this quote. The Basic Texts were first drafted to members in 1981 and published in 1983.

 

6. “There are only two ways to live your life. One is as though nothing is a miracle. The other is as though everything is.

There is no first hand source of Einstein’s writing or speeches that contains this quote. The first appearance of this quote that I can find is in  (2006) by Robert E. Hinshaw, . In this book Hinshaw quotes Gilbert Fowler White’s Journal of France and Germany (1942 – 1944) as the original source of the quote. It is here that Gilbert Fowler White wrote,

“As I look back over the truly crucial events in my life I realize that they were not planned long in advance. Albert Einstein said, ‘There are only two ways to live your life. One is as though nothing is a miracle. The other is as though everything is.’”

The most likely source of Gilbert’s for an Einstein quote on miracles would be David Reichenstein’s Die Religion der Gebildeten (1941), which was released a year prior to Gilbert’s Journal. It is here that Reichenstein asks Einstein about Arthur Liebert’s theory that uncertainty and indeterminism in quantum mechanics allows for the possibility of miracles. Einstein replied that he could not accept the argument because it dealt “with a domain in which lawful rationality does not exist. A miracle, however, is an exception from lawfulness; hence, there where lawfulness does not exist, also its exception, i.e., a miracle, cannot exist.

Gilbert Fowler White may have inadvertently invented this Einstein quote based on his understanding of Einstein’s  above.

Benjamin Franklin and Religion: In His Own Words

There is often debate on what Benjamin Franklin’s religious views were. Let’s find out what he believed by examining his own words in his letters, treatises, and books below.

Benjamin Franklin was born in Boston, Massachusetts on January 17, 1706, and baptized at Old South Meeting House. Early in life, Benjamin Franklin questioned his Protestant upbringing. He wrote in his autobiography,

“My parents had early given me religious impressions, and brought me through my childhood piously in the Dissenting way. But I was scarce fifteen, when, after doubting by turns several points as I found them disputed in the different books I read, I began to doubt of the Revelation itself. Some books against Deism fell into my hands; they were said to be the substance of the sermons which had been preached at Boyle’s Lectures. It happened that they wrought an effect on me quite contrary to what was intended by them. For the arguments of the Deists, which were quoted to be refuted, appeared to be much stronger than the refutations; in short, I soon became a thorough Deist.” [1]

Deists hold that there is a supreme being or God, which is evident through reason in the natural world, and that organized religion is not needed to discover God. Deistic belief in a natural God could be distinguished from the Christian messiah God. Deists at the time used names like “Supreme Judge” or “Father of the Gods”, while Christians often cited, “Lord and Savior”, or explicitly mentioned Jesus. Many deists rejected a supernatural worldview. This also included ideas such as salvation, hell, the divinity of Jesus, and most religious dogma. Benjamin Franklin indeed, doubted these things. Some deists also held that the Supreme Being guided all events without suspension of the natural order or laws of the universe.

Franklin’s 1725 work, A Dissertation on Liberty and Necessity, Pleasure and Pain, expounded on some of his early beliefs. One of Franklin’s concerns was on the the problem of evil. Like earlier philosophers such as Epicurus and later ones such as David Hume, Franklin noted that the idea of an omniscient, omnipotent, and benevolent God appeared to contain contradictions. Franklin wrote in his essay,

“1. It is suppos’d that God the Maker and Governour of the Universe, is infinitely wise, good, and powerful.
2. In consequence of His infinite Wisdom and Goodness, it is asserted, that whatever He doth must be infinitely wise and good;
3. Unless He be interrupted, and His Measures broken by some other Being, which is impossible because He is Almighty.
4. In consequence of His infinite Power, it is asserted, that nothing can exist or be done in the Universe which is not agreeable to His Will, and therefore good.
5. Evil is hereby excluded, with all Merit and Demerit; and likewise all preference in the Esteem of God, of one Part of the Creation to another.” [2]

Benjamin Franklin reconciled the problem of evil by postulating that all happenings were in accordance with the goodness of God, and that there was no room for evil. His dissertation continues,

“It will be said, perhaps, that God permits evil Actions to be done, for wise Ends and Purposes. But this Objection destroys itself; for whatever an infinitely good God hath wise Ends in suffering to be, must be good, is thereby made good, and cannot be otherwise.” [2]

Franklin reasoned that God necessitated that, all things are as they are meant to be, and that morality was indistinguishable to man,

“and which from the attributes of God, his infinite wisdom, goodness, and power, concluded that nothing could possibly be wrong in the world and that vice and virtue were empty distinctions”. [1]

Franklin later came to be embarrassed by his resolution that, “vice and virtue were empty distinctions”, believing that he had led himself and his friends astray with the idea. He wrote, “I began to suspect that this doctrine, though it might be true, was not very useful.” Franklin’s later works would incorporate more advocacy for being ethical through Puritan values.

In 1728 Benjamin Franklin authored Articles of Belief and Acts of Religion, in which he wrote,

“I believe there is one Supreme most perfect Being, Author and Father of the Gods themselves. For I believe that Man is not the most perfect Being but One, rather that as there are many Degrees of Beings his Inferiors, so there are many Degrees of Beings superior to him. Also, when I stretch my Imagination thro’ and beyond our System of Planets, beyond the visible fix’d Stars themselves, into that Space that is every Way infinite, and conceive it fill’d with Suns like ours, each with a Chorus of Worlds for ever moving round him, then this little Ball on which we move, seems, even in my narrow Imagination, to be almost Nothing, and my self less than nothing, and of no sort of Consequence. When I think thus, I imagine it great Vanity in me to suppose, that the Supremely Perfect, does in the least regard such an inconsiderable Nothing as Man. More especially, since it is impossible for me to have any positive clear Idea of that which is infinite and incomprehensible, I cannot conceive otherwise, than that He, the Infinite Father, expects or requires no Worship or Praise from us, but that he is even INFINITELY ABOVE IT. But since there is in all Men something like a natural Principle which enclines them to DEVOTION or the Worship of some unseen Power; And since Men are endued with Reason superior to all other Animals that we are in our World acquainted with; Therefore I think it seems required of me, and my Duty, as a Man, to pay Divine Regards to SOMETHING. I CONCEIVE then, that the INFINITE has created many Beings or Gods, vastly superior to Man, who can better conceive his Perfections than we, and return him a more rational and glorious Praise. As among Men, the Praise of the Ignorant or of Children, is not regarded by the ingenious Painter or Architect, who is rather honour’d and pleas’d with the Approbation of Wise men and Artists…

It is that particular wise and good God, who is the Author and Owner of our System, that I propose for the Object of my Praise and Adoration. For I conceive that he has in himself some of those Passions he has planted in us, and that, since he has given us Reason whereby we are capable of observing his Wisdom in the Creation, he is not above caring for us, being pleas’d with our Praise, and offended when we slight Him, or neglect his Glory.” [6]

Benjamin Franklin wrote to Joseph Huey in 1753. In his letter he suggested that to be virtuous one must practice charitable acts rather just keep religious customs,

“The faith you mention has doubtless its use in the world; I do not desire to see it diminished, nor would I endeavour to lessen it in any man. But I wish it were more productive of good works than I have generally seen it: I mean real good works, works of kindness, charity, mercy, and publick spirit; not holiday-keeping, sermon-reading or hearing, performing church ceremonies, or making long prayers, filled with flatteries or compliments, despised even by wise men, and much less capable of pleasing the deity. The worship of God is a duty, the hearing and reading of sermons may be useful; but if men rest in hearing and praying, as too many do, it is as if a tree should value itself on being watered and putting forth leaves, though it never produced any fruit.” [10]

In 1757 Franklin set sail to Falmouth. After being chased, and outrunning several other ships, Franklin still had yet to endure the worst of the trip. On the last night before reaching the port of Falmouth, the watchman on the ship, who Franklin said “perhaps had his eyes shut, and was half asleep”, did not see the lighthouse approaching. Only by the accidental yaw of the ship, did the crew notice that they were, “running fast on the rocks on which the light was erected”. With great alarm in the middle of the night, the captain woke, jumped on deck, and ordered the ship to turn full round, which saw them narrowly avoiding a disastrous ship wreck. The next morning they were able to dock safely in Falmouth.

Franklin wrote a letter to his wife in which he told her of the near ship wreck and added,

“The bell ringing for church, we went thither immediately, and with hearts full of gratitude, returned sincere thanks to God for the mercies we had received, were I a Roman Catholic perhaps I should on this occasion vow to build a chapel to some saint, but as I am not if I were to vow at all it should be to build a light house.”

This is often misquoted as “Lighthouses are more helpful than churches.”

Franklin did not attend church often, but believed “weak and ignorant men and women” could become virtuous through religion. He wrote a letter in 1757 to an unknown author (sometimes cited as Thomas Paine),

“You yourself may find it easy to live a virtuous life, without the assistance afforded by religion; you having a clear perception of the advantages of virtue, and the disadvantages of vice, and possessing a strength of resolution sufficient to enable you to resist common temptations. But think how great a portion of mankind consists of weak and ignorant men and women, and of inexperienced, inconsiderate youth of both sexes, who have need of the motives of religion to restrain them from vice, to support their virtue, and retain them in the practice of it till it becomes habitual, which is the great point for its security. And perhaps you are indebted to her originally, that is, to your religious education, for the habits of virtue upon which you now justly value yourself.” [3]

The letter goes on to suggest that the author’s book (possibly The Age of Reason) would incite ire in contemporary authors. Franklin advises him,

“…not to attempt unchaining the tiger, but to burn this piece before it is seen by any other person; whereby you will save yourself a great deal of mortification by the enemies it may raise against you, and perhaps a good deal of regret and repentance. If men are so wicked with religion, what would they be if without it.” [3]

In a letter Benjamin Franklin wrote to Richard Price, Franklin criticized the Massachusetts Constitution for allowing religious tests for public office, and advocated for an early version of the separation of church and state,

“When a Religion is good, I conceive that it will support itself; and, when it cannot support itself, and God does not take care to support, so that its Professors are oblig’d to call for the help of the Civil Power, it is a sign, I apprehend, of its being a bad one.” [5]

At the Constitutional Convention in 1787 Franklin asked the members to conduct daily prayer while America was at war with Great Britain,

“I have lived, Sir, a long time and the longer I live, the more convincing proofs I see of this truth — that God governs in the affairs of men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without his notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without his aid?” [8]

However, the motion was not warmly welcomed and Franklin afterwards wrote that, “the Convention, except three or four persons, thought prayers unnecessary”. [9]

In 1790 near the end of his life, Franklin wrote a private letter to Ezra Stiles,

“I confide that you will not expose me to criticism and censure by publishing any part of this communication to you.”

Sorry, Franklin.

The letter goes on,

“As to Jesus of Nazareth, my opinion of whom you particularly desire, I think the system of morals, and his religion, as he left them to us, the best the world ever saw, or is likely to see; but I apprehend it has received various corrupting changes, and I have, with most of the present dissenters in England some doubts as to his divinity; tho’ it is a question I do not dogmatize upon, having never studied it, and think it needless to busy myself with it now, when I expect soon an opportunity of knowing the truth with less trouble. I see no harm, however, in its being believed, if that belief has the good consequence, as it probably has, of making his doctrines more respected and better observed; especially as I do not perceive that the Supreme takes it amiss, by distinguishing the unbelievers in his government of the world with any particular marks of his displeasure.”

While not an atheist, Franklin defended them here in his private communication. The letter goes on,

“I have ever let others enjoy their religious sentiments, without reflecting on them for those that appeared to me unsupportable and even absurd. All sects here, and we have a great variety, have experienced my good will in assisting them with subscriptions for building their new places of worship; and as I have never opposed any of their doctrines, I hope to go out of the world in peace with them all.” [7]

Benjamin Franklin’s religious views can be at times complex, but hopefully these quotations have provided a clearer picture for the reader. Thank you for reading.

Bibliography

[1] “Benjamin Franklin’s Autobiography.” USGenNet. The First and Only Nonprofit Historical-Genealogical Web Hosting Service on the Internet! History, Historical, Family History, Genealogy, Genealogical. Family Values. History and Genealogy. Genealogy and History. ISP. Web. 06 July 2010. <http://www.usgennet.org/usa/topic/preservation/bios/franklin/chpt4.htm>.

[2] Franklin, Benjamin. “The Writings of Benjamin Franklin: Boston and London, 1722 – 1726 — A Dissertation on Liberty and Necessity, Pleasure and Pain.” The History Carper — Primary Source Documents, Histories, and Stories. Web. 06 July 2010. <http://www.historycarper.com/resources/twobf1/m7.htm>.

[3] “WallBuilders – Historical Writings – Benjamin Franklin’s Letter to Thomas Paine.” WallBuilders | Presenting America’s Forgotten History and Heroes, with an Emphasis on Our Moral, Religious, and Constitutional Heritage. Web. 06 July 2010. <http://www.wallbuilders.com/LIBissuesArticles.asp?id=58>.

[4] Isaacson, 2003, p.486

[5] “Letter from Benjamin Franklin to Richard Price.” Inspiration, Spirituality, Faith, Religion.- Beliefnet.com. Web. 06 July 2010. <http://www.beliefnet.com/resourcelib/docs/40/Letter_from_Benjamin_Franklin_to_Richard_Price_1.html>.

[6] Franklin, Benjamin. “The Writings of Benjamin Franklin, Volume II: Philadelphia, 1726 – 1757 — Articles of Belief and Acts of Religion.” The History Carper — Primary Source Documents, Histories, and Stories. Web. 06 July 2010. <http://www.historycarper.com/resources/twobf2/articles.htm>.

[7] “Franklin to Stiles.” Constitution Society Home Page. Web. 06 July 2010. <http://www.constitution.org/primarysources/franklin-stiles.html>.

[8] “Online Speech Bank: Benjamin Franklin’s Prayer Speech at the Constitutional Convention of 1787.” American Rhetoric: The Power of Oratory in the United States. Web. 06 July 2010. <http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/benfranklin.htm>.

[9] “Standing the Founding Fathers on Their Heads.” Religion Online. Web. 06 July 2010. <>.

[10] “Benjamin Franklin on Religion.” Bhaktivedanta Memorial Library. Web. 06 July 2010. <http://bvml.org/GCIAH/franklin.html>.

The Infinite Ocean

Lately I’ve been reading . It is a collection of zen lessons from four zen masters who lived in turbulent periods in Chinese history. The lessons are translated and assembled by J.C. Cleary, a Ph.D. in East Asian Languages and Civilizations from Harvard University.

The first lesson I want to examine is The Infinite Ocean by Chinese Zen master Hengchuan (1222 – 1289). The lesson reads:

Hengchuan held up the staff and said, “The ocean of reality-nature has no shores. Mountains, rivers, and the great earth are waves on this ocean. Sun, moon, and stars are waves on this ocean. It flows into the nostrils of all the buddhas of past, present, and future. If all of you want to emerge [from your bubble of delusion and witness this ocean], go slowly and gently reawaken.”

In this lesson Hengchuan’s staff symbolizes the teaching function and salvific work of the Zen adepts. The ocean of reality-nature refers to the system of natural laws that constitute the natural order of the universe. This natural order is everywhere and everything. Hengchuan expounds on this by saying the mountains, rivers, earth, the sun, and the moon are all facets, or waves, of this single, underlying reality. All Buddhas are part of, and can correctly perceive, this true nature of reality. If you want to escape your bubble of delusion, or your misconceptions about the nature of reality which causes suffering, then you must reexamine the world freshly without the fallacious preconceptions that you have built up.

This nature of reality is the natural order of things all around us – not the categorizations, labels, biases, and feelings we have may have about it. Reality is the territory, and our perceptions are the map. If our map is incorrect we will be deluded about the territory. If one is able to correctly perceive the nature of the universe, then one will not be deluded into the wrong thinking and wrong action that causes suffering. If one can shed their preconceptions, reawaken, and examine the world for what it is with a fresh pair of eyes, then one can perceive the true nature of reality like the Buddhas perceive it.