Turkey: The Country not the Bird

My wife and I recently returned from a cruise in the Mediterranean where we saw the sites of Italy, Greece and Turkey. I had thought that Erdogan’s Islamization of Turkey would have made it a very repressive country, and that Attaturk’s vision of a secular Turkey was as dead and buried as he was. I also thought that Italy and Greece were mostly western countries in the mold of Western Europe. What I found was the opposite.

While I loved visiting Italy and Greece once again, the impression I received was one of vibrant Third World countries that didn’t use credit cards — I constantly had to change dollars into euros in Rome and Athens – and countries that would be more at home in Eastern Europe. However, the museums were fantastic — even though you don’t know when parts of them will closed at weird hours for lack of money. The ancient Roman and Greek sites made it feel as if Rome and Greece still ruled the world, but those days are definitely millennia passed.

I expected Turkey to be similar, and it was in regard to credit cards, but it was much stranger than Italy or Greece. Arriving in Istanbul, the first thing you notice are the mosques, hundreds of them adorning the cityscape. I felt as if I’d arrived in an alien world where the mosques almost seemed as if they were flying saucers that had temporarily landed.

Istanbul, Turkey

One thing the government under the General Directorate of Foundations is trying to do is to reconvert museums and churches into mosques. There are no shortage of mosques, and according to the locals, one does not need a mosque to pray. Those that have been reconverted include the thirteenth century Haghia Sophia Church in Trabzon. As another example, after an earthquake in Istanbul in 1999, the sixth century Church of St. Sergius and Bacchus . The present Islamic government of Turkey has a choice to make. So far, they seem to be making the wrong one.

Once you acclimate yourself to the ever present mosques, you will notice how western the city of Istanbul really is. You feel you could be in Belgium, England or even the US. The people we met, especially the younger generation were decidedly modern and anti-Erdogan. They appreciated western values and didn’t want to give them up. Even one religious young man who was trying to find his place within Islam didn’t want to give up the freedoms his generation has sampled. While Erdogan may wish proudly to lead his people back to the seventh century, the modern generation is more than happy to remain in the twenty-first, and some of them are willing to fight for their freedoms. Attaturk may not be dead after all.

In many ways Istanbul is a modern city, it is a hub for international business and a modern cosmopolitan city. Even in the nineteenth century spice bazaar, you can get your Turkish Delight candy specially cut for you and then have the box shrink wrapped for freshness and to go easily through customs. But it is also pays attention to its traditional side in the care it takes to present its time-honored Mediterranean cooking. Its vegetarian tradition is beyond compare. In short, Turkey has the best of the old and the new. My wife and I liked it so much that we are thinking of going back in the spring. With the warmth of its people, its western and eastern flavors and its marvelous ancient archaeological sites, Turkey is a better than Disneyland because it’s all real. If its government can avoid wrecking it, Turkey will remain a wonder of the ancient and modern world.

Debunking Fake Albert Einstein Quotes

Albert Einstein tongueLast updated on May 2, 2013

The reason for the proliferation of so many fake quotes attributed to Einstein is that he has become synonymous with genius and wisdom. Surely, if Einstein had said these things, then they must be wise indeed!

This post will examine popular quotes on the internet that have been falsely or mistakenly attributed to Albert Einstein.

I will update this page as more fake Einstein quotes circulate the internet. Please post a comment for any questions or corrections.

 

Fake Quotes Attributed to Einstein

1. “Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”

This false quotation is commonly printed on self-help and motivation posters. While the sentiment is nice, there is no evidence Einstein ever said this.

The first appearance of this quote is from  (2004) by Matthew Kelly, p. 80, however there is no evidence of it being printed prior, and no evidence Einstein said it.

The quote is probably based on  (1940) by George Reavis, where a fish goes to school and is required to work on his running and climbingThe Animal School was reprinted in 1999 and may have influenced Matthew Kelly or someone else to create this fake attribution.

Another alternative is that the false quotation is based on what Einstein Self-Portrait (1936),

What is significant in one’s own existence one is hardly aware, and it certainly should not bother the other fellow. What does a fish know about the water in which he swims all his life?

This real quotation may have influenced the false one above.

 

2. “It would be my greatest sadness to see Zionists do to Palestinian Arabs much of what Nazis did to Jews.”

There is no recorded evidence that Einstein ever said this quotation.

The motivation for this fake quote should be apparent. It would be beneficial to pro-Palestinian activists to show that a paragon of wisdom, and a Jew himself no less, was also pro-Palestinian and/or anti-Israel.

This fake quotation also compares Zionists to Nazis, which is suspicious because Einstein was a supporter of Labor Zionism. However, Einstein did sign an in 1948 that said, “Among the most disturbing political phenomena of our times is the emergence in the newly created state of Israel of the “Freedom Party” (Tnuat Haherut), a political party closely akin in its organization, methods, political philosophy and social appeal to the Nazi and Fascist parties.” The fake quote originally posted above, may have been inspired from this open letter.

 

3. “Logic will get you from A to B. Imagination will take you everywhere.”

This is another fake motivational/inspirational quote attributed to Einstein. The first recorded instance I found of this quote is from  (2010) by Alice Calaprice and Freeman Dyson on p. 481, however Alice lists the quote under the “Probably Not By Einstein” section.

There is no evidence Einstein ever said this quote, and frankly it doesn’t sound like something Einstein would say, as he was a highly logical individual.

 

4. “Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius—and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction.

This quote is actually written by E. F. Schumacher in a 1973 essay titled “Small is Beautiful” which appeared in The Radical Humanist: volume 37, .

This first false attributions of this quote to Einstein began to circulate on the internet in 1997, and then later appeared in print in BMJ: The British Medical Journal, volume 319, 23 October 1999, .

 

5. “The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.

There is no evidence Einstein ever said this. The likely origin of this quote is from the Basic Texts of Narcotics Anonymous, which is the first known source of this quote. The Basic Texts were first drafted to members in 1981 and published in 1983.

 

6. “There are only two ways to live your life. One is as though nothing is a miracle. The other is as though everything is.

There is no first hand source of Einstein’s writing or speeches that contains this quote. The first appearance of this quote that I can find is in  (2006) by Robert E. Hinshaw, . In this book Hinshaw quotes Gilbert Fowler White’s Journal of France and Germany (1942 – 1944) as the original source of the quote. It is here that Gilbert Fowler White wrote,

“As I look back over the truly crucial events in my life I realize that they were not planned long in advance. Albert Einstein said, ‘There are only two ways to live your life. One is as though nothing is a miracle. The other is as though everything is.’”

The most likely source of Gilbert’s for an Einstein quote on miracles would be David Reichenstein’s Die Religion der Gebildeten (1941), which was released a year prior to Gilbert’s Journal. It is here that Reichenstein asks Einstein about Arthur Liebert’s theory that uncertainty and indeterminism in quantum mechanics allows for the possibility of miracles. Einstein replied that he could not accept the argument because it dealt “with a domain in which lawful rationality does not exist. A miracle, however, is an exception from lawfulness; hence, there where lawfulness does not exist, also its exception, i.e., a miracle, cannot exist.

Gilbert Fowler White may have inadvertently invented this Einstein quote based on his understanding of Einstein’s  above.

Is Leonard Peltier Guilty or Innocent and Does He Deserve to be Released?

Leonard PeltierI went to hear legendary music stars Jackson Browne and 93-year-old Pete Seeger sing, and just to see the no-longer-singing Harry Belafonte, Peter Coyote, and Danny Glover. The rapper Mos Def and Michael Moore also put in surprise appearances. The most powerful performance, however, was by a Native American singer song-writer named Bill Miller.

The event was the Bring Leonard Peltier Home in 2012 Concert. I must admit I was more interested in the musicians than the politics. By the end of the four-hour teach-in and song-fest dedicated to the American Indian Movement (AIM), I was convinced that Peltier was a martyr to a run-amok government conspiracy that was going to either execute him or put him in jail for life for either killing or being part of a conspiracy to kill two FBI agents in 1975.

When I got home, I googled Peltier and found a much more complex picture. Peltier was no Gandhi or even Nelson Mandela. He was a revolutionary around whom people seemed to die.

Peltier was fleeing a warrant, and later acquitted, for the attempted murder of an off-duty Milwaukee police officer. Then later in 1975, Peltier, as a member of American Indian Movement, was at Pine Ridge in South Dakota when two FBI agents in unmarked cars were fired on. Over one hundred bullets from high-powered rifles hit the cars, seriously wounding the two agents, who were then finished off execution style with bullets to the head. After fleeing, Peltier was extradited from Canada apparently based on coerced and perjured testimony. While two others were acquitted because they said they fired because they feared for their lives, a defense that worked in the 1970s, the government learned from its mistakes and got a conviction. Numerous subsequent appeals have failed to yield a new trial.

At the time, Peltier gave himself at least three different alibis saying in each that he was not at the shooting. Other Indians, however, have said that he was the executioner. In 2002, an editorial appeared in the News from Indian County stating that a number of Indians, including AIM members, had told the editor that they had carried a heavy burden in knowing, but not revealing, that Peltier was the executioner.

What no one has ever heard from Peltier is remorse over the shootings of the agents. Most likely, they had wives who would never grow old with them, and children who would never again have fathers. Whether Peltier actually executed the two or not, he was there, and he was at least partially responsible for the widowing and orphaning of the two families. When I hear Peltier’s apology rather than his denials, I will have more compassion for him. It may be nice to be a plaster saint, but people are usually sinners.

Posted in History, Music | Tagged AIM, American Indian Movement, Bill Miller, Bring Leonard Peltier Home in 2012 Concert, conspiracy, Danny Glover, FBI, Harry Belafonte, Jackson Browne, Leonard Peltier, , Mos Def, Native American, News from Indian County, Pete Seeger, Peter Coyote, Pine Ridge Indian Reservation, South Dakota | 4 Replies

Provenance and the Antiquities Trade

Those who are involved in the trade of antiquities need to learn the history of ownership of an object, known as its provenance, to ensure that they are not buying a stolen or looted object. We now live in a world in which provenance is almost more important than the artifact itself.

In 1970 it became illegal to export antiquities from many countries. Therefore, if an antiquity arrived in the US before 1970, and that can be proven, then it’s in the US legally and there is little need to worry about a foreign government claiming it.

But what should happen to the hundreds of thousands of antiquities whose provenance is completely unknown or only partly known? Many of these items do not have a good provenance for several reasons.

First, until the 1990s or even later, most collectors cared much more about the quality and beauty of an item than the line of succession of its previous owners. Second, dealers, for business reasons, did not want collectors to know the name of the previous owner to prevent collectors from going directly to them. Third, owners are now so afraid of running afoul of government restrictions that they no longer want their names associated with their artifacts, so the new owners are only told incomplete information, such as “from a Los Angeles collector, acquired in the fifties.” Fourth, while owners do usually keep a bill of sale for their most expensive pieces, many owners either do not keep or their heirs discard documentation of moderately priced items.

Some in the archaeological world want all artifacts sent back to their countries of origin, despite the fact that several countries can claim the same artifact, that some countries don’t have the money or space to house them, and that volatile countries have had museums and storehouses looted in times of unrest.

The only way to maintain the world’s artifacts is to have them as broadly dispersed as possible, between the native countries, museums and private collectors, who frequently donate altruistically or selfishly to museums. Otherwise, we may find ourselves in a situation in which major and minor artifacts are donated only to the museums of countries whose requirements are not as strict as our U.S. ones.

Some archaeologists would like to abolish the sale of antiquities in the hopes of preserving archaeological contexts - the place where an item was found and the other objects it was found with. However, a ban would just drive the trade underground.

Why The World Isn’t Flat: Debunking Thomas Friedman

Ha-Joon Chang, a South Korean economist, gave a lecture for the New America Foundation on February 1, 2008 titled Why The World Isn’t Flat. The lecture was on why developing nations should look at the history of successful nations, rather than just adopting the orthodox free market approach being demanded of them. Chang’s speech was based on his book , in which he demonstrates why unfettered capitalism is not a good idea for developing countries.

The conventional wisdom states that out of thirty or so successful countries, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan were the only ones to succeed with subsidies and government intervention while all the others had an orthodox free market, but Chang says that the opposite is actually true – the Netherlands, Hong Kong, and Switzerland were the only countries that managed to succeed with an orthodox free market.

Chang gives Japan’s support of Toyota as one example of the success of protectionism. He also brings up Alexander Hamilton’s support for a protected manufacturing economy in the United States.

A metaphor Chang uses to refute Thomas Friedman’s “flat world” in which all countries compete on a level playing field, is that of boxing’s weight classes. It makes no sense for an economic lightweight like Honduras to want to go up against a heavyweight like the United States. The global economic competition is a game of unequal players. The developing countries like Honduras need a titled playing field on which they can protect and subsidize their producers in order to compete.

Ha-Joon Chang’s full lecture is available to view below:

Woody Allen and William F. Buckley

In 1967 Woody Allen invited the conservative William F. Buckley on to his show to field audience questions with him. Woody’s ability to turn any question asked of him into a joke is truly hilarious. Buckley as the stodgy conservative makes for a great counterpart to the liberal Woody Allen. The questions asked of them cover presidential politics, Israel, mini-skirts, and more.


The Insane Quotes of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

The Iranian President, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, is a controversial and polarizing figure.

His wide ranging statements include Holocaust denial, insinuations that Israel should be destroyed, declaring that the United States has never won a war, and saying that there are no homosexuals in Iran.

There is some debate whether Ahmadinejad has seriously called for Israel to be destroyed, or whether he meant that Israel’s form of government should end. The truth is he has called for both – for Israel to be destroyed, and its government to be ended.

Below is a list of statements made my Mahmoud Ahmadinejad categorized by Holocaust denial, statements on Israel, statements on the United States, and statements on technology and culture.

Holocaust Denial

“They have invented a myth that Jews were massacred and place this above God, religions and the prophets. The West has given more significance to the myth of the genocide of the Jews, even more significant than God, religion, and the prophets, (it) deals very severely with those who deny this myth but does not do anything to those who deny God, religion, and the prophet. If you have burned the Jews, why don’t you give a piece of Europe, the United States, Canada or Alaska to Israel? Our question is, if you have committed this huge crime, why should the innocent nation of Palestine pay for this crime?” SourceJewish Virtual Library (December 2005)

Of course, some governments and their people always hated the Jews because of the ugly conduct of some of them. They wanted to drive the Jews out of Europe. But anti-Semitism was planned mainly by some European governments and politicians, and by the Zionist network. They made hundreds of films, wrote hundreds of books, spread rumors, and conducted psychological warfare, in order to drive them away, to the land of Palestine. Four or five years after World War II, they suddenly claimed that during that war, the Holocaust affair had taken place. In other words, according to their claims, several million Jews were burned in the crematoria. They created two slogans. The first was about the injustice suffered by the Jewish people. By means of lies, very twisted propaganda, and psychological warfare, they created the notion that the Jews suffered injustice, and, secondly, that they needed a land and an independent state. They acted so effectively that some of the world’s politicians and intellectuals were also deceived and influenced.”
Source: MEMRITV (September 18, 2009)

“If the Holocaust that you talk about was real, why don’t you allow the subject to be studied? One can freely research any issue, except for this issue, which is sealed. It is a black box, which they do not allow to be opened or reexamined. They do this in order to exploit it.”
Source: MEMRITV (September 18, 2009)

On Israel

“Anybody who recognizes Israel will burn in the fire of the Islamic nation’s fury.”
Source: CNN (October 27, 2005)

There is no doubt that the new wave in Palestine will soon wipe off this disgraceful blot from the face of the Islamic world.”
Source: Al Jazeera (October 26, 2005)

“Today too, the most important issue in the world is Palestine. If a war breaks out in Iraq, we believe it is due to the provocation of the Zionists. If it happens in Afghanistan, it is because of their provocation. If Sudan is oppressed, it is due to Zionist seduction. We consider all the arrogant, colonialist schemes to be inspired by the Zionists.”
Source: MEMRITV (September 18, 2009)

“The world powers established this filthy bacteria, the Zionist regime, which is lashing out at the nations in the region like a wild beast.”
Source: Jerusalem Post (February 20, 2008)

“Death to Israel! Death to Israel!”
Source:

“I want to tell them (western countries) just as the Soviet Union was wiped out and today does not exist, so will the Zionist regime soon be wiped out.”
Source: Democracy Now! (December 13, 2006)

“The establishment of the Zionist regime was a move by the world oppressor against the Islamic world.”
Source: Worldpress (October 30, 2005)

“Our dear Imam said that the occupying regime [Israel] must be wiped off the map and this was a very wise statement… I have no doubt that the new wave that has started in Palestine, and we witness it in the Islamic world too, will eliminate this disgraceful stain from the Islamic world.”
Source:

“Confronting this regime and opposing Zionists are a national duty, as well as religious and Islamic duty, and a human duty. Even the people of Europe and America despise the Zionists. They hate them. They feel humiliated by the Zionists, who are a burden on them.”
Source: MEMRITV (September 18, 2009)

“I believe that with the complete formation of the global Zionist network, they have seized control of the fate of the European governments, and of the US government. To the independent countries in the world, I would like to say: You should know that the influence of the Zionist network on your culture, your politics, and your economy is tantamount to a violation of your independence. They cling like ticks. The moment they gain influence, they never stop.”
Source: MEMRITV (September 18, 2009)

On the United States

“The United States has never entered a serious war, and has never been victorious.”
Source: The Atlantic (September 21, 2010)

Is it possible for us to witness a world without America and Zionism? You should know that this slogan, this goal, can certainly be achieved.”
Source: New York Post (September 23, 2007)

Technology and Culture

“We will convert the entire world to Islam with our logic. We are confident that the Islamic logic, culture, and discourse can prove their superiority in all fields over all schools of thought and theories.”
Source:

“In Iran we don’t have homosexuals like in your country. […] In Iran we do not have this phenomenon. I don’t know who’s told you that we have this.”
Source:

“Is there art that is more beautiful, more divine, and more eternal that the art of martyrdom?  A nation with martyrdom knows no captivity. Those who wish to undermine this principle undermines the foundations of our independence and national security . . . The message of the (Islamic) Revolution is global, and is not restricted to a specific place or time . . . Allah willing, Islam will conquer what?  It will conquer all the mountain tops of the world.”
Source: 

 

Oliver Stone’s Revisionist History

The New York Film Festival hosted the first three hours of Oliver Stone’s self-described “revisionist history” of World War II through the present, soon to be shown on Showtime. Those three episodes of Stone’s “Untold History of the United States” concerned World War II and its immediate aftermath.

Director Stone, known for his leftist views and conspiracy theories, and his associate Peter Kuznick discussed their work and fielded questions. First, I would note that Stone gave a surprisingly complex view of this history. Secondly, where he tried to be provocative, I think he was many times wrong.

His hero of World War II is Vice President Henry Wallace, one of the elite class that Stone usually despises. His villain is the man of the people President Harry Truman.

Stone believes that if progressive Henry Wallace had been nominated as Vice President in 1944, the outcome of modern history would have been different. In spite of his evident popularity with the common people and the unions, the Democratic Party bosses connived to get anybody but Wallace nominated. According to our director, they stooped so low that they eventually decided on know nothing Harry Truman, a man who could be easily manipulated. After his successful nomination and election, Truman only had to wait about three months to become President. During his wait, he only saw the President twice and didn’t even know about the Manhattan Project to build the atomic bomb.

According to Stone, Truman was at best a naïf, at worst a stooge of the Party bosses. Stone considers him, like many of his contemporaries, a small town racist whose major talent was failing at business several times and who got into politics so one party boss could show that he could get anyone elected, even Truman. While Stone tells us of Truman’s bankruptcy at a haberdashery, he doesn’t mention that Truman and his partner spent the next several years repaying all the money they owed, for that might show Truman in a different light. Stone detests Truman for not stopping the use of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Stone said that the Soviet Union’s entry into the war against Japan obviated the need to bomb. While the vast majority of Americans back then believed it was a necessary evil to prevent from hundreds of thousands to more than a million casualties if the US had to invade the main Japanese islands, Stone knows the Japanese would have surrendered anyway, in spite of an attempted coup by junior officers, which Stone downplays. We all know that “junior” officers never succeed in coups, but don’t tell that to the Third world.

Stone doesn’t like the fact that Japan was told to surrender unconditionally, but partially because of that, Japan hasn’t been a military power for almost 70 years. Neither has Germany nor Italy for that matter.

Stone does show that German racism against the Japanese prevented the former from informing their ally of major decisions, thus helping to end the war earlier, and that American racism against the West Coast Japanese forced them into camps for the duration of the war. The American and allied bombing against the enemies’ civilian populations after Germany and Japan showed the allies how to do it, is surely a low point in a series of low moral points of each side. However, the systematic extermination, rape and torture by the Axis powers do not get the play they deserve. The Americans and their allies were sometimes beastly, but the Axis powers were positively subhuman. Just ask the six million Jews of Europe. Oh, I’m sorry, you can’t. Well maybe you could ask the Gypsies, homosexuals, three million Poles or twenty million Russians. Perhaps the only one on a par with the Germans was Stalin.

But what if patrician Henry Wallace had managed to get the Democratic VP nomination in 1944? Stone believes that anti-war and pro civil rights Wallace would have allowed Japan to surrender with conditions, would have prevented the atomic bomb from being used, would have stopped the arms race and would have integrated the country. I think that, had Wallace been President, the party bosses, the Republican party and the right, including Hoover, McCarthy and many others would have hounded him from the day he took office. Think of what Obama has had to experience and multiply that tenfold. His progressive tendencies would have been blocked by a more conservative congress, and his life would have been a living hell. At best, he probably would have been impeached. There is no way he would have been more than a one term President.

Regarding “naïf” or “stooge” Harry Truman, he integrated the armed forces, started the post-war reconstruction, founded NATO (a negative to the left), and recognized Israel, which the far-left love to compare with Nazi Germany. Sometimes you have to be a Nixon to go to China. Regarding Israel, it certainly wasn’t the Party bosses or the genteelly anti-Semitic elite or the State Department who wanted Israel to exist. Politically, it wasn’t a smart decision, but perhaps it was a moral one.

Stone and Kuznick are to be commended for their extensive research, but they would have done better with a little less revisionary provocation and a little more attention to the greater forces that determine our world.

Posted in Film, History, Politics | Tagged Democrats, Harry Truman, Henry Wallace, New York Film Festival, , Peter Kuznick, , Untold History of the United States, World War II | Leave a reply